Brown and Janssen on the Arrow of Explanation in Special Relativity
ثبت نشده
چکیده
I examine the debate between Michel Janssen and Harvey Brown over the arrow of explanation in special relativity. Brown argues that the symmetries of the dynamical laws explain the symmetries of space-time, whereas Janssen argues for the converse. Janssen has recently argued against Brown’s position on the grounds that it recommends trying to infer information from the relativistic effects, e.g., length contraction, in a way wasteful of time and resources. I show how Brown can respond to Janssen and trace the dispute not to a methodological difference, but to opposing positions on the meaning of spatio-temporal symmetries. According to Janssen, the symmetries of space-time are constraints on dynamical laws. According to Brown, symmetries of space-time arise jointly from matter distributions and the laws governing matter. Finally, I provide some considerations in favor of Brown’s position.
منابع مشابه
Drawing the line between kinematics and dynamics in special relativity
Special relativity is preferable to those parts of Lorentz’s classical ether theory it replaced because it shows that various phenomena that were given a dynamical explanation in Lorentz’s theory are actually kinematical. In his book, Physical Relativity, Harvey Brown challenges this orthodox view. I defend it. The phenomena usually discussed in this context in the philosophical literature are ...
متن کاملPrinciple or constructive relativity
Appealing to Albert Einstein’s distinction between principle and constructive theories, Harvey Brown has argued for an interpretation of the theory of relativity as a dynamic and constructive theory. Brown’s view has been challenged by Michel Janssen and in this paper I investigate their dispute. I argue that their disagreement appears larger than it actually is due to the two frameworks used b...
متن کاملThe Principle of Relativity: From Ungar’s Gyrolanguage for Physics to Weaving Computation in Mathematics
This paper extends the scope of algebraic computation based on a non standard $times$ to the more basic case of a non standard $+$, where standard means associative and commutative. Two physically meaningful examples of a non standard $+$ are provided by the observation of motion in Special Relativity, from either outside (3D) or inside (2D or more), We revisit the ``gyro''-theory ...
متن کاملWhy special relativity should not be a template for a fundamental reformulation of quantum mechanics
In a comparison of the principles of special relativity and of quantum mechanics, the former theory is marked by its relative economy and apparent explanatory simplicity. A number of theorists have thus been led to search for a small number of postulates—essentially information theoretic in nature—that would play the role in quantum mechanics that the relativity principle and the light postulat...
متن کاملA constructive approach to the special theory of relativity
Several factors make special relativity initially difficult to understand. One factor is the strongly counterintuitive nature of some of the important results, especially the relativity of simultaneity, time dilation, and length contraction. Another factor is that special relativity is usually taught, both in the classroom and textbooks, differently from other areas of physics in the undergradu...
متن کامل